国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站丨av无码不卡在线观看免费丨国产成人综合色就色综合丨92成人午夜福利一区二区丨狼群精品一卡二卡3卡四卡网站丨久热爱精品视频在线9丨少妇性l交大片毛多丨无码人妻丰满熟妇区bbbbxxxx丨美女视频黄是免费丨波多野结衣视频网丨天堂中文最新版在线中文丨www.亚洲黄色丨国产欧美日韩小视频丨69式视频丨五月婷婷中文丨日日日网站丨欧美tv丨www色天使丨中文字幕无码日韩欧毛丨国产黄色激情视频

Unitalen Defended Clients against “Asphalt Truck” Patent Infringement Suit

December 16, 2016

Posted on December 15, 2016

 

On December 25, 2015, CRRC Qiqihar Locomotive Co., Ltd, Dalian Container Company under CRRC Qiqihar Transportation Equipment Co., Ltd, and Qinzhou North Gulf Logistics Co., Ltd. (jointly the “Defendants”) received from Sichuan Chengdu Intermediate People’s Court the Notice of Responding to Action concerning the lawsuit filed by Tianjin Zhaohua Logistics Co. Ltd. (the plaintiff) for infringement of utility model patent. 

 

Entrusted by all three defendants, Unitalen took up the case and first filed a jurisdiction opposition to Chengdu Intermediate Court on the ground that although the actual user of the alleged infringing goods locates in Sichuan, Sichuan shall not be the venue of jurisdiction since the plaintiff has given up the right to sue the actual user. On April 22, 2016, Chengdu Intermediate People’s Court issued an adjudication confirming that the court has no jurisdiction over the case, as none of the three defendants’ residencies are in Sichuan province; that the plaintiff could neither prove Sichuan to be the venue of production, sales or use of the alleged infringement product, nor to be the venue where infringement consequence had taken place. Accordingly, the court decided to transfer the case to Guangxi Naning Municipal Intermediate People’s Court, the venue of the third defendant’s residence.

 

As the second step, Unitalen started invalidation proceedings against all three utility model patents cited by the plaintiff. After review, the Patent Reexamination Board of SIPO announced total invalidation of two of the cited utility model patents, and partial invalidation of the third. Subject to the partial invalidation, the protection scope of the third utility model patents has become completely different from the technical solution of the alleged infringed products.  

 

As a result, the plaintiff had no choice but withdrawn its litigation requests against all three defendants.

 

 

Keywords